retrorefa.blogg.se - Smbup one user at a time

#Smbup one user at a time how to
#Smbup one user at a time software
#Smbup one user at a time mac

The forums are likely the best source for a solution for whichever version of OS X someone uses, since this is usually a problem with Apple’s SMBX implementation, and not specific to OSMC and Kodi.

#Smbup one user at a time mac

SOME Mac users who want to use OSX shares via SMB, with other non-apple devices, resorted to installing the “Samba” version via SMBUp (which was created specifically as a workaround), but it’s not a perfect solution if you read the SMBUp FAQ. That issue reportedly also exists in OS X Sierra. With Mavericks 10.9, there was compatibility problems with some NAS storage systems, and a workaround, at least when I last looked into it, was to force SMB1 (by using CIFS:// for example).Įl Capitan 10.11.5 was reported as causing a large slowdown in transfer speeds. With OSX 10.8.2, many users were having speed problems. SMBUp is a workaround that goes back to OS X 10.7, and is even mentioned on the Kodi Wiki. My recommendation is to never lock and report a conflict if it happens.I am solved my problem with SMBUp server for OSX, works perfecrtly! As default SMB in Mac isn’t working.Īpple’s own “SMBX” implementation on OS X has been broken at various times for various reasons. See for example MediaWiki as it allows concurrent edits and has a good UI in case of conflicts:

#Smbup one user at a time software

Most wiki software can merge changes to the same text field if there are no conflicts: The application should submit only the fields of the record that are changed. Last to submit overwrites other concurrent changes.This is not preferred as it will decrease concurrency and the record may be locked for more time than needed.

#Smbup one user at a time how to

I am really looking for any guiding points, advice, or tips you can provide on how to properly sync data between multiple instances of this web app. Second, if I don't put a lock on it, how do I reconcile whose changes to accept? This involves the situation in 1 because user 1 could submit the data and before user 2 receives the updated data, he/she may have gone ahead and submitted his/her's changes. Say there are two users changing the same task at the same time.įirst, should I allow that situation to happen or should I put a lock on it until one or the other person is done making changes?

Some patterns I have looked at are Observer and Mediator - are there others that should be considered over these?.

What design patterns are there that assist in implementing this function? I have solved my problem by using application variable which contain list of userIds as string.I am setting this application varible to blank when the application is started in this userIds append in this string for every user login. task completed, deleted, etc., the task list of all the users who have this task will be updated. If a single task that is common to multiple users changes in any way e.g.

So the conceptual problems I am attempting to reconcile are the following: I am trying to leave details of the project out of this as I'm grappling more with the overall concept of how to handle the following situations, but if it helps, I'm using Java, EclipseLink, and GWT with RequestFactory implemented. Each user has his/her own account to login and view the tasks they are assigned it is possible for multiple users to have a single task in-common.

This is a master task list whose task items get distributed by an authorized user. There's a project I'm working on that is looking to produce a web application that will manage a task list between multiple users.